Patriot Realm

Imagine a world with no government.

I have to wonder: would that be such a bad thing? Government has not been our friend for some time, has it? 

When we think of anarchy, the image that often springs to mind is one of lawless mayhem, a world without rules or structure. Anarchy is defined as a state of society without government or law. Political and social disorder due to the absence of governmental control.

Which brings me to today's topic. That of anarchy. Selective governance and the shadow world between anarchy and governance. For that is where we are. 

These days, we are living in parallel societies. Where the rules only apply to those who follow them. The rest? Hell, it is open season for lawlessness. 

In our world where governments wield substantial power over " their " citizens, the concept of selective governance might seem far-fetched. 

This is where they have gone wrong. We are NOT their citizens. They are OUR elected representatives and they should start behaving as such. 

In many ways, selective governance is already rife in some western cities and countries. It is just being done in the name of " progress " and multi culturalism. Just look at Britain at the moment. 

We are teetering on the edge of civil war, World War and societal break down. We are facing a global crisis. Moral compasses are doing pole shifts and laws are only enforced according to the new overlord called Diversity, Equity and Inclusion.

Minority rule is everywhere. In fact, we are no longer democracies when the majority are punished for not doing what the minority want and DEMAND. 

Yet our governments are pushing this Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. 3% of the population is in control of any given social issue. 

Want to wear a neon tutu with combat boots? Go for it!  You want to be a boy today and a girl tomorrow? No worries. And if you want to be a cat just demand a litterbox in your school room and you'll be literally good to go.   

Let's face it: selective governance is already alive and well. In some parts of America, people can walk or cycle into a store, fill up a bag with designer clothing, food, jewellery or electronics, saunter on out and, as long as it's worth under $900, you are off the hook where the law is concerned.

In one day, someone could go to the grocery store, the butcher, the baker, the bloody candlestick maker and come home with a bounty of goodies and the staff will simply hold the door open and thank you for shopping with them. 

In Australia, you can steal a car, rampage through a shopping centre and do whatever you want - as long as you are suntanned or belong to a certain religion. Oh, and under 16 years of age is a bonus. 

Britain is hardly a shining ray of harmony these days and Australia is not far behind. This was a year ago (video below ) and things have seemingly gotten worse since then. 

Putting my sarcastic hat on, selective governance's laid-back attitude can be quite liberating when it comes to the daily commute.

Sure, it might be a bit chaotic at first, but think of the adrenaline rush as you navigate the urban jungle, honking your horn in glorious solidarity with your fellow anarchy enthusiasts.

You can glue yourself to a road, disrupt traffic and, as long as it is done in the name of climate change, pro Palestine or veganism, you can disrupt life for the fools who still follow the rules.

On the one side of the selective governance spectrum, we have looting and shoplifting running rampant. Civil disobedience and crime are out of control. On the other, we have ordinary people being arrested, beaten and accused of being far right for saying " enough ' when little children are murdered. Or raped. Or both. 

We see a nation castigated for defending its citizens against attack and being threatened with annihilation.  We see a vocal minority condemning them for fighting back. People who suffer attack, home invasion or worse... are arrested and charged and the perpetrator is let free. 

Under true anarchy, nothing would be against the law because there would be no laws. But these days, under selective governance, rules are only applied to those that do not agree with the government or party line. 

Anarchy proposes a departure from institutionalised control, allowing individuals to explore uncharted territories and ideas without fear of censorship or retribution. Oh, how tempting. 

On the one hand, it could be like the Wild West - kill or be killed. Survive or die. Cities could become sewers of discontent and people would starve. No gardens, no backyards, no ability to exist without the laws and the government imposing their will and their objectives.  Only the fittest would survive.  

Oh, hang on a minute. They already are. 

The people in rural areas would thrive. Communities would band together and elect marshalls to keep them safe, vigilante groups would form. The bad guys would be sent out of town, hanged from a tree or disappear in an unmarked grave and the folk would breathe a sigh of relief that the Marshall and his deputies had saved the town, once again. 

Within a few years, we would have laws written and the townsfolk would elect someone to represent them.  

And it would all start again. 

The bottom line is simple: Government of, by and for the people. I read that somewhere. 

The answer is to have fair rules, fair play and fair playing fields. Governments whose REPRESENTATIVES represent the majority, not the minority. 

Not rules for one group and not for the other. 

 Otherwise? We might see riots, civil disorder and revolution.........